-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Priority:
Medium
-
US Core (FHIR)
-
3.1.1
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
Profiles and Extensions
-
3.17.1.1
-
-
Eric Haas/Drew Torres: 6-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
The "Profile Specific Implementation Guidance" section says this:
- The content.url may refer to a FHIR Binary Resource (i.e. [base]/Binary/[id]), FHIR Document Bundle (i.e [base]/Bundle/[id] or other endpoint.
The last part "or other endpoint" is the only hint that a referenced document could live on an entirely different server, potentially with separate authorization requirements.
I wonder if it would be worthwhile to further specify expectations and provide guidance on what should be supported. For example, must these links – if outside of the FHIR base URL – always be accessible without additional authorization?