Ballot Feedback: Handshake Protocol

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • SMART Web Messaging (FHIR)
    • current
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • (NA)
    • 1.8.2
    • Hide

      I'm marking this not persuasive (with mod) because the resolution was to include the handshake optionally, even though this CR was not supportive of the change.  However, we found no reason to not include it optionally.

      Show
      I'm marking this not persuasive (with mod) because the resolution was to include the handshake optionally, even though this CR was not supportive of the change.  However, we found no reason to not include it optionally.
    • Bas van den Heuvel / Matt Varghese: 8-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

      We don't see the value of a handshake in this context. As mentioned, just because it worked once does not mean it will work the next time, and lack of response is a good indicator that something is wrong and would need to be handled.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jenni Syed
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: