How was the perspective of those who would like to implement FHIR but haven’t yet incorporated into the rankings?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
    • current
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • Approaches to Exchanging FHIR Data
    • 3.0.2 Overview of Approaches
    • Hide

      The ranking reflects (and can only reflect) those that have implemented FHIR. The premise is that early adopters are likely to choose the approaches with the most desirable balance of functionality and ease of implementation and there's no reason to expect that late adopters who choose to use FHIR at all would make different choices.

      Balloter accepts resolution

      Show
      The ranking reflects (and can only reflect) those that have implemented FHIR. The premise is that early adopters are likely to choose the approaches with the most desirable balance of functionality and ease of implementation and there's no reason to expect that late adopters who choose to use FHIR at all would make different choices. Balloter accepts resolution
    • Marti Velezis / James Tcheng : 6-0-1

      Many physician practices have likely not yet implemented FHIR. The perspective of physicians practicing in a variety of settings—not just those in large health systems—is critical. How was the perspective of those who would like to implement FHIR but haven’t yet incorporated into the rankings?

      Existing Wording:

      2. Adoption indicates whether or not systems that have implemented FHIR for data exhange are likely to support the approach

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: