-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Priority:
Highest
-
US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
-
current
-
Clinical Interoperability Council
-
Approaches to Exchanging FHIR Data
-
3.0.2 Overview of Approaches
-
-
Marti Velezis / James Tcheng : 6-0-1
Perhaps we are misunderstanding what “their local practitioner registry” refers to, but if it is taking information housed by a practitioner and syncing it to a different registry, doesn’t the payer need to seek appropriate permissions to do so from the local practitioner registry? Will likely depend (from a HIPAA perspective) on the purpose of the synchronization. Also would require a way to deal with PHI requiring additional consents from the patient prior to redisclosure (e.g., Part 2 data).
Existing Wording:
A payer is synchronizing their local practitioner registry with a centralized registry
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-13471 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2020-Sep-FHIR IG HRex R1 STU
- Balloted
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...