Does this overhaul of HRex necessitate revision in the other Da Vinci guides?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
    • current
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • Home
    • 1.0 Home
    • Hide

      It's not appropriate for this guide to speak of changes to other Igs. Specific expectations are that Cdex and Pdex will be updated to reflect changes to member match and data retrieval, pCDE will be updated to reflect new data retrieval and all will be updated to point to conformance and security/privacy language

      This was raised by the balloter as a question - no change was expected.  (But because it's a negative, we can't move to be a question)

      Show
      It's not appropriate for this guide to speak of changes to other Igs. Specific expectations are that Cdex and Pdex will be updated to reflect changes to member match and data retrieval, pCDE will be updated to reflect new data retrieval and all will be updated to point to conformance and security/privacy language This was raised by the balloter as a question - no change was expected.  (But because it's a negative, we can't move to be a question)
    • Marti Velezis / James Tcheng : 6-0-1

      Does this overhaul of HRex necessitate revision in the other Da Vinci guides? If so, has that been done, or is there a plan to align the other guides?

      Existing Wording:

      Based on balloter feedback, this IG has been completely re-written. The refactoring has been sufficiently large that it is not practical/useful to enumerate a list of changes.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: