Should it say old and not new?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
    • current
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • HRex Parameters - Member Match Response Profile
    • 9.10.1 Resource Profile
    • Hide

      The intention here is to echo back the new plan as that's the linkage that we're trying to establish.  We will update the description to make more clear why it's being passed back.  (Technically, it's not necessary as the linkage can be done through the request, but this was done for convenience of the implementers.)

      Show
      The intention here is to echo back the new plan as that's the linkage that we're trying to establish.  We will update the description to make more clear why it's being passed back.  (Technically, it's not necessary as the linkage can be done through the request, but this was done for convenience of the implementers.)
    • Marti Velezis / Jimmy Tcheng : 6-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Old? This is the old plan’s response, correct?

      Existing Wording:

      • The new health plan coverage resource.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: