The two terms specify whether to include closed gaps in the response, but I see no place for the response to include closed gaps.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Da Vinci DEQM (FHIR)
    • 2.1.0 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • DEQM Gaps In Care Gap Status Value Set
    • Hide

      In the DEQM GIC Composition Profile, change the cardinality of entry that references DEQM GIC Detected Issue from 0..* to 1..*. 

      Update the DEQM GIC Detected Issue Profile to add a new modifying element "gap status" that binds to the DEQM GIC Status Value Set. 

      Show
      In the DEQM GIC Composition Profile, change the cardinality of entry that references DEQM GIC Detected Issue from 0..* to 1..*.  Update the DEQM GIC Detected Issue Profile to add a new modifying element "gap status" that binds to the DEQM GIC Status Value Set. 
    • Bryn Rhodes/Rob McClure: 21-0-0
    • Correction
    • Non-compatible

      The two terms specify whether to include closed gaps in the response, but I see no place for the response to include closed gaps.

      Existing Wording:

      care gaps parameter

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jay Lyle
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: