Suggest to use the terms "Ordering Provider" and "Rendering Provider"

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Post Acute Orders (FHIR)
    • 0.3.0 [deprecated]
    • Orders & Observations
    • (NA)
    • Must Support and Missing Data
    • Hide

      This IG is using the nomenclature in US Core R4 to describe MustSupport.  Changing to Ordering Provider and Rendering Provider will create confusion.  In addition, since the inclusion of an intermediary must be taken into account, the term sender may apply to either the Ordering Provider or the Intermediary and the Term receiver may apply to either the intermediary or the Rendering Provider.

      Show
      This IG is using the nomenclature in US Core R4 to describe MustSupport.  Changing to Ordering Provider and Rendering Provider will create confusion.  In addition, since the inclusion of an intermediary must be taken into account, the term sender may apply to either the Ordering Provider or the Intermediary and the Term receiver may apply to either the intermediary or the Rendering Provider.
    • Bob Dieterle / Marti Velezis : 11-0-6

      Suggest to use the terms "Ordering Provider" and "Rendering Provider" instead of Sender and Recipient

      Existing Wording:

      Systems claiming to conform to a profile SHALL support the elements in a profile as defined below: This guide adopts the following definitions of MustSupport for all direct transactions between the Sender and Recipient or Intermediary

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Ricardo Quintano
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: