-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Electronic Case Reporting (FHIR)
-
1.1.0 [deprecated]
-
Public Health
-
US Public Health PlanDefinition
-
-
Sarah Gaunt / John Loonsk : 28-0-1
-
Correction
-
Non-substantive
It seems odd that PlanDefinition.type is flagged as Must Support but not required (0..1) when the .coding element is fixed to a value of workflow-definition. Is the workflow-definition the only type of PlanDefinition that will be allowed? If so, why is .type not required 1..1?
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-15335 Affirmative - Craig Newman : 2021-Jan-FHIR IG eCR R1 STU
- Balloted