Consider removing this text.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Core (FHIR)
    • 3.1.1
    • Cross-Group Projects
    • US Core Implantable Device Profile
    • Hide

      Will express this as a

      Must Support - Choice of Profile Elements

      http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/conformance-expectations.html#must-support---choice-of-profile-elements

       

      1.  add invariants and mark a  0..1 MS

       1. and update the Profile specific implementation guidance:

      to state that:

      "Although both will get marked as must support, servers are not required to support both udi_HRF and udi_AIDC but they SHALL support at least one of these elements"

       

      Show
      Will express this as a Must Support - Choice of Profile Elements http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/conformance-expectations.html#must-support---choice-of-profile-elements   1.  add invariants and mark a  0..1 MS  1. and update the Profile specific implementation guidance: to state that: "Although both will get marked as must support, servers are not required to support both  udi_HRF  and udi_AIDC but they  SHALL  support  at least one  of these elements"  
    • Brett Marquard/Floyd Eisenberg:8-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive

      How is this supportive of UDI? This is the implantable device profile that is intended to support the UDI requirements.

      Existing Wording:

      Servers are not required to support both carrierAIDC and carrierHR

      (Comment 44 - imported by: Jean Duteau)

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            mrocca
            mrocca
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: