Never send observations with a status of 'cancelled'.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Core (FHIR)
    • 3.1.1
    • Cross-Group Projects
    • (NA)
    • Hide

      The UI/UX is out of scope for this IG. 

       Add this generic statement about clinical safety to the security page:

      "When implementing FHIR, implementers need to be aware of the risks and tradeoff and are encouraged to review the clinical safety section in the core specification: http://hl7.org/fhir/safety.html"

      Show
      The UI/UX is out of scope for this IG.   Add this generic statement about clinical safety to the security page: "When implementing FHIR, implementers need to be aware of the risks and tradeoff and are encouraged to review the clinical safety section in the core specification:  http://hl7.org/fhir/safety.html"
    • Brett Marquard/Gay Dolin: 11-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      (Comment about http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/valueset-observation-status.html)
      In the real world, the abandoned / aborted concept is a patient safety risk IF IT IS SENT. Receiving systems manage these differently, and if the record is displayed with / without the abandoned/aborted - it will take precious clinician time to understand the meaning of the record. Why are these EVER sent?

      Existing Wording:

      Canonical Status: "~abandoned"
      The observation is unavailable because the measurement was not started or not completed (also sometimes called "aborted").

      Proposed Wording:

      Aborted

      (Comment 5 - imported by: Jean Duteau)

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            s_mitchell
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: