-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Highest
-
US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
-
current
-
Patient Care
-
Specification [deprecated]
-
8.3.4.2
-
-
Eric Haas/Jay Lyle: 5-0-8
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Unclear how this imposes "excessive" P&S risks? Please explain. Wouldn’t it be the same issue with polling? The payer polls until there is a change; is there a step where there is then a query to actually GET the data?
Existing Wording:
The subscription notification could contain the Task and associated data in the response but this approach imposes excessive privacy and security risks on the sender.
(Comment 9 - imported by: Jean Duteau)
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-15166 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2021-Jan-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Balloted