Consider merging into one section, as they are represented in one XML.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • Electronic Case Reporting (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0 [deprecated]
    • Public Health
    • Artifacts Summary
    • —Section 8.125.1.2 DeviceNames
    • Hide

      Will change this to just a regular Device example. This is the narrative that is generated automatically by the IG publisher. Will manually create the narrative for this example for better representation as suggsted.

      Show
      Will change this to just a regular Device example. This is the narrative that is generated automatically by the IG publisher. Will manually create the narrative for this example for better representation as suggsted.
    • Sarah Gaunt / John Loonsk : 28-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

      Consider merging into one section, as they are represented in one XML (i.e., there is not two use cases/examples). Not all of the elements in this section have to do with "Device Name"
      Why are these attributes separated? Name, Model Number and Type can be pulled from GUDID using UDI-DI (or is this being collected/exchanged without a look-up?)

      (Comment 57 - imported by: Jean Duteau)

            Assignee:
            Sarah Gaunt
            Reporter:
            mrocca
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: