Can the requirement for case reporting before going to a PH be expressed more clearly in the eRSD.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • Electronic Case Reporting (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0 [deprecated]
    • Public Health
    • (NA)
    • Requirements/narrative
    • Hide

      Will add guidance to PlanDefinition that some sort of secondary processing is needed - more clear language and ideally something computable to say "suspected reportable but needs further processing to make final determination of reportability"

      Show
      Will add guidance to PlanDefinition that some sort of secondary processing is needed - more clear language and ideally something computable to say "suspected reportable but needs further processing to make final determination of reportability"
    • Sarah Gaunt / AbdulMalik Shakir : 29 - 0 - 0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Not clear in eRSD requirement for case reporting that indicates that there is a need for secondary rules processing before going to a PH (implementers confused - think that once it's triggered it can go straight to the PHA) - can this be expressed more clearly in the eRSD
      Corollary: If there is a supplemental bundle with rules is there a way of automatically indicating that it should be employed?

      (Comment 73 - imported by: Jean Duteau)

            Assignee:
            Sarah Gaunt
            Reporter:
            Sarah Gaunt
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: