CodeableReference data type not necessary

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Highest

      We don't think the CodeableReference data type is necessary.  It introduces a change that is not backwards compatible.  We don't see the problem with the existing approach using the '[x]' syntax to represent a choice of data types.  Also, we think it may be problematic from a validation perspective to require a CodeableReference data type for an element when both elements of that data type (concept and reference) are optional.  

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Howard Strasberg
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: