AuditEventServerity codes aren't apprpriate for a required binding

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved

      The codes listed are poorly defined, are not clearly orthogonal and don't seem like they are codes that can consistently be mapped to by implementers. If we're going to have a required binding, it needs to be super clear to implementers exactly what codes to map to from their own internal codes. As well, the set of codes should generally be the minimum necessary to allow appropriate mapping - there seem to be more here than can reasonably be differentiated.

      (Comment 4 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Lloyd McKenzie
            Lloyd McKenzie, Ron Parker
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: