This set of codes needs lots of work. The word "doctor" excludes a whole lot of licensed professionals that appear to be in scope, but because of wording are excluded. The distinction between doctor and practitioner is unclear - and both are talking about 'actor' roles, while the role here is as an 'entiy' - why aren't the definitions speaking in those terms? In fact, many of the roles are speaking about 'acting' roles, not passive 'entity' roles. And some appear to be redundant with the Entity type codes. Given that there are no standard codes for roles in PractitionerRole (which is narrower than the scope here), it's certainly not appropriate to believe we can reasonably standardize roles for audit events across the whole world - or expect implementers to map. This needs to be replaced with an example binding to an enumerated value set showing the range of possible roles that could possibly appear here.

(Comment 30 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)