Again, incoherent value set. Many of these codes are 'role' codes - they indicate capacity, not what the agent actually did. They have poor definitions, have duplicates and overlap, no hierarchy across the codes. There are too many codes to map to and no chance there's global concensus that these are the appropriate codes everyone should be mapping to. This must be changed to an example binding to a simplificied value set of actual functions an agent can perform to show the range of possibility (and possibly the choices of code systems in which concepts could be found).

(Comment 81 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)