These codes are being used in a specific context - i.e. where the Provenance.target indicates the resource created and the Provenance.entity indicates something used in the creation of that target. The codes listed here should be expressed accordingly, ideally with some examples of what this would mean. I have no idea how a real-world FHIR event could result in 'quotation'. What would result in 'removal'? I've read the definition for 'source' multiple times and don't understand it. Also, the code set seems limited for a 'required' binding. What about 'translation'? 'redaction'? 'organization'? 'encoding'? This doesn't seem like an obvious "this is the precise set of codes that everyone in the world needs to map to to have useful interoperability". Please provide evidence that there is indeed global consensus on this set of codes or relax the binding.

(Comment 83 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)