-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
DSTU1 [deprecated]
-
Modeling & Methodology
-
(NA)
-
3
-
-
Enhancement
-
Non-substantive
-
DSTU1 [deprecated]
Existing Wording \\n/a
Proposed Wording \\n/a
Comments
An analysis of the element naming used in the 99 resources in the FHIR ballot indicates that of there are 2266 elements, with 718 unique names, where 454 of those names are only used in a single resource.
This maybe problematic, as it is very likely that synonyms are present in the 454 single use names.
Grahame's Comments
Calvin might share his analysis and we could look for problems and generate specific tasks. But in general, there is not obvious problem in these numbers
Disposition
Pending input from submitter
Disposition Comment
Certainly there will be synonyms. For example "prescriber" vs. "author" vs. "orderer", however this is by design. Names use the terminology commonly used within a given domain. Is there a reason this is a problem?
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-23 Negative - Calvin E. Beebe : 2015-Jan-FHIR R1
- Balloted