Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #28

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Orders & Observations
    • (NA)
    • Resources
    • Hide

      Existing Wording:

      DiagnosticOrder\\NutritionOrder

      Proposed Wording:\\DiagnosticRequest
      NutritionRequest

      3/3/2015 NutritionOrder Call

      Motion not persuasive. Eric Haas/ Donna

      Against: 0 Abstain: 0 For: 8

      Nutritiion Order discussion: Questions about legal ramification here. CMS guidelines etc like order writing priveleges.


      duplicate see 5283 OO already vote to keep as NO and DO

      Show
      Existing Wording : DiagnosticOrder\\NutritionOrder Proposed Wording :\\DiagnosticRequest NutritionRequest 3/3/2015 NutritionOrder Call Motion not persuasive. Eric Haas/ Donna Against: 0 Abstain: 0 For: 8 Nutritiion Order discussion: Questions about legal ramification here. CMS guidelines etc like order writing priveleges. duplicate see 5283 OO already vote to keep as NO and DO
    • Enhancement

      Existing Wording \\DiagnosticOrder\\NutritionOrder

      Proposed Wording \\DiagnosticRequest\\NutritionRequest

      Comments
      With the addition of the notion of a proposal in FHIR and the use of a status to denote the difference between something that is planned, proposed, or actually ordered, resources suffixed with -Order should probably renamed to be suffixed with -Request.

      Grahame's Comments
      MnM may have an opinion. I don't

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Claude Nanjo (Inactive)
            Claude Nanjo (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: