Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #34

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Patient Care
    • Condition
      Procedure
    • Resources
    • Hide

      CHANGE:?Will use repeating "bodySite" element with nested site[x] with choice of CodeableConcept or Reference(BodySite)

      PC WG Block Vote - 3/5/15

      Moved:? Lloyd/Eric --?? Abstain - 0, Negatives - 0, Approve - 11

      Show
      CHANGE:?Will use repeating "bodySite" element with nested site [x] with choice of CodeableConcept or Reference(BodySite) PC WG Block Vote - 3/5/15 Moved:? Lloyd/Eric --?? Abstain - 0, Negatives - 0, Approve - 11
    • Enhancement
    • Non-compatible
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Comments
      Currently Body Site is modeled in different ways in different resources. In Condition, there is the notion of 'Location'. In Procedure, it is a code. We would like to recommend a more consistent approach to modeling body site, perhaps as a resource of its own that can be profiled as needed.

      Grahame's Comments
      I think that body site should usually be a choice of a codeableConcept or a reference to an new resource with full details

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Claude Nanjo (Inactive)
            Claude Nanjo (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: