Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #98

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • References
    • 1.13.5.0
    • Hide

      adjustment to grammatical consistency, contained resources

      2015/03/09 MnM/FHIR Block Vote: Grahame/James 6/0/0

      Show
      adjustment to grammatical consistency, contained resources 2015/03/09 MnM/FHIR Block Vote: Grahame/James 6/0/0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Existing Wording
      For example, if a Condition resource references a particular Patient as its subject, and it links to a Procedure resource as its cause, there is no automatic rule or implication that the procedure has the same patient for its subject.

      Proposed Wording
      For example, if a Condition resource references a particular Patient as its subject, and references a Procedure resource as its cause, there is no automatic rule or implication that the procedure has the same patient for its subject.

      Comments
      The changed wording makes it clearer that the subject of both clauses is "a Condition." As originally worded, some could interpret the sentence to mean that the patient links to a Procedure resource. Also, for consistency, I suggest using the word "reference" twice rather than "references...links to"

      Grahame's Comments
      ok

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            david_tao
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: