Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #138

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • DetectedIssue
    • 4.10.3
    • Hide

      CHANGE:?Will expand on example to indicate that in this case, the duplicate therapy Contraindication would be included with a submission along with a mitigation code noting the duplication was intended - and thus avoid decision support rules that might otherwise reject the instance.

      PC WG Block vote - 3/5/15

      Moved:? Lloyd/Eric --?? Abstain - 0, Negatives - 0, Approve - 11

      Show
      CHANGE:?Will expand on example to indicate that in this case, the duplicate therapy Contraindication would be included with a submission along with a mitigation code noting the duplication was intended - and thus avoid decision support rules that might otherwise reject the instance. PC WG Block vote - 3/5/15 Moved:? Lloyd/Eric --?? Abstain - 0, Negatives - 0, Approve - 11
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Existing Wording
      E.g. Noting that a duplicate therapy is actually intended.

      Comments
      Confusing, in that saying that a duplicate theory is actually intended means that it is not a contraindication. That seems to require a "negation indicator" but there is none in this resource. So how could this example be represented by Contraindication?

      Grahame's Comments
      ?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            david_tao
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: