Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #292

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • (NA)
    • 3
    • Hide

      Much work has gone into this area since this ballot comment.

      Show
      Much work has gone into this area since this ballot comment.
    • James Agnew / Grahame Grieve: 4-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Existing Wording
      45 Resources DSTU 1.0
      99 Resources DSTU 2.0
      Flat Architecture with No Conceptual Layering.
      Cut and Paste Implementation.
      Designed by Committee.

      Proposed Wording
      Its not going to be easy, but things worth doing are not easy.

      Core Features of Frameworks:
      - Full of Trade-offs.
      - Simplicity verses Power
      - Designed to Evolve
      - Borrow from the Past
      - Integrate
      - Consistency
      - Progessive

      Consider Architectural Review Process?

      Comments
      If FHIR is to replace V2, V3 and CDA it needs to manage the inherent complexity of Healthcare systems develpoment.
      It needs to provide better interoperabilty as a business model to provide incentive to replace V2.
      It needs provide Conceptual Integrity in its resource model so implementers intuitively know how to use the framework to solve complex problems.

      Grahame's Comments
      well, there is one. But we do need to beef it up

      Disposition
      Pending input from submitter

      Disposition Comment
      It's not clear what's being asked for here. What is meant by "Conceptual Integrity" and what concrete changes does the submitter feel would achieve that?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Matthew Graham
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: