-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
DSTU1 [deprecated]
-
FHIR Infrastructure
-
(NA)
-
3
-
-
James Agnew / Grahame Grieve: 4-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Non-substantive
-
DSTU1 [deprecated]
Existing Wording
45 Resources DSTU 1.0
99 Resources DSTU 2.0
Flat Architecture with No Conceptual Layering.
Cut and Paste Implementation.
Designed by Committee.
Proposed Wording
Its not going to be easy, but things worth doing are not easy.
Core Features of Frameworks:
- Full of Trade-offs.
- Simplicity verses Power
- Designed to Evolve
- Borrow from the Past
- Integrate
- Consistency
- Progessive
Consider Architectural Review Process?
Comments
If FHIR is to replace V2, V3 and CDA it needs to manage the inherent complexity of Healthcare systems develpoment.
It needs to provide better interoperabilty as a business model to provide incentive to replace V2.
It needs provide Conceptual Integrity in its resource model so implementers intuitively know how to use the framework to solve complex problems.
Grahame's Comments
well, there is one. But we do need to beef it up
Disposition
Pending input from submitter
Disposition Comment
It's not clear what's being asked for here. What is meant by "Conceptual Integrity" and what concrete changes does the submitter feel would achieve that?
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-285 Negative - Matthew Graham : 2015-Jan-FHIR R1
- Balloted