Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #294

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Considered - No action required
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Bundle
    • 6.8.3
    • Hide

      Approved as edited/published,?FHIR core telecon, 12-Feb 2015 3-0-2

      Show
      Approved as edited/published,?FHIR core telecon, 12-Feb 2015 3-0-2
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Comments
      If we want to have Bundles be the information package for Transactions where each entry within the bundle may be the subject of a different FHIR Operation then we should separate the Operation name from the 'status' element, make its type 'coding' to support easy extension to additional operations, use this consistently for all operations rather same named such as 'update' yet using other fields to imply an operation such as completing the deleted element to indicate perfoming a 'delete', and provide a flag field to indicate whether the operation halts on eooros only, errors and warnings or none.

      Grahame's Comments
      we could signifcantly increase the compleity of transactions like this, yes. We could turn them into a monster. Not that they already aren't. I am opposed to doing this just because we can see a way to make statements when we haven't counted the cost of doing them, nor do we have any use cases for doing so

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Andy Stechishin (Inactive)
            Melva Peters
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: