Jan 2015 Ballot Comment #304

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Patient Administration
    • Practitioner
    • 5.4.4
    • Hide

      Note that an extension could be used if needed (and a proposal to define a common extension could be submitted)

      We believe that most systems do not have a concept of a practitioners primary language. The Languages provided in the communication field should be considered that the practitioner is able to communicate medical information to patients.

      Show
      Note that an extension could be used if needed (and a proposal to define a common extension could be submitted) We believe that most systems do not have a concept of a practitioners primary language. The Languages provided in the communication field should be considered that the practitioner is able to communicate medical information to patients.
    • Clarification

      Existing Wording \\Practitioner.communication

      Comments
      Would adding somewhy to determine the primary communication for a practitioner be valuable

      Grahame's Comments
      see #301

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Andy Stechishin (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: