2015May sdc #94 - Procedure and ProcedureRequest statuses overlap

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Patient Care
    • Procedure
      ProcedureRequest (see ServiceRequest) [deprecated]
    • 4.8, 4.9
    • Hide

      Status values will be aligned with workflow patterns, per http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=10293

      Show
      Status values will be aligned with workflow patterns, per http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=10293
    • Elaine/Stephen: 6-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-compatible
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Existing Wording: status

      Comment:

      Status values overlap between Procedure and ProcedureRequest. Might one replace ProcedureRequest.completed with closed and remove 'in-progress' (= accepted)? Could either procedure.status or procedureReques.status use a 'scheduled' value?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jay Lyle
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: