2015May core #131 - Did you consider making the title 1..1 if the section is present?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Structured Documents
    • Composition
    • Hide

      add a comment explaining that sections generally SHOULD have titles, but in some documents, it is unnecssary or inappropriate (provide examples - diagnostic report example from NEHTA, single section documents). Most IGs will make section.title required

      Show
      add a comment explaining that sections generally SHOULD have titles, but in some documents, it is unnecssary or inappropriate (provide examples - diagnostic report example from NEHTA, single section documents). Most IGs will make section.title required
    • Calvin Beebe / Brett Marquard: 29-0-2
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Existing Wording: Section.title

      Proposed Wording: N/A

      Comment:

      Did you consider making the title 1..1 if the section is present?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Brett Marquard
            Brett Marquard
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: