Existing Wording: Observation.comments - May include statements about significant, unexpected or unreliable values, or information about the source of the value where this may be relevant to the interpretation of the result.

Comment:

V2 NTE has a way to distinguish between boiler plate- comments that are about the test in general which are not a function of the patient or the patients test results versus those that are patient specific.

These distinctions are important for creating compact summaries- which would typically exclude the boiler plate but keep the patients specific information

This seems to be arguing for the latter only (which is good). But it a little soft could be clearer and it would be helpful to V2 users to relate this to the NTE observation comments and the field that distinguished between the ( I think) 3 classes of comments which many systems might be using specialization to the specific patient or the observation obtained.

These are not related to the specific results. These comments seem to exclude such boiler plate