2015May core #278 - what happened to mention of LOINC in context of observations?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Orders & Observations
    • Observation
    • 4.20.3
    • Hide

      Unable to come up with a dispostion without more input. There was never a mention of LOINC in this context as far back as DSTU 1. We used LOINC extensively in value sets and example bindings for Observation.code. If this is not what is meant then can reopen and revisit in future

      8/20/2015
      Block vote on OO FHIR call

      Show
      Unable to come up with a dispostion without more input. There was never a mention of LOINC in this context as far back as DSTU 1. We used LOINC extensively in value sets and example bindings for Observation.code. If this is not what is meant then can reopen and revisit in future 8/20/2015 Block vote on OO FHIR call
    • Lorraine Constable/Diego Lopez: 6-0-3
    • Enhancement

      Existing Wording: In some cases, such as when source data is coming from a v2 feed, a system may not have information that allows it to distinguish

      diagnosis, allergy and other "specialized" types of observations from lab, vital sign and other observation types intended to be

      conveyed with this resource. In those circumstances, such specialized observations may also appear using this resource.

      Comment:

      what happened to mention of LOINC in context of observations?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            clemmcdonald
            clemmcdonald
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: