2015May core #818 - Communication.party role type not known?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Low
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Patient Care
    • Communication
    • 5.21.3
    • Hide

      Add guidance that, if the communication is to an individual whose role is not known (practitioner, patient or related person), for example if the system just has an email address, to default to using RelatedPerson.

      Show
      Add guidance that, if the communication is to an individual whose role is not known (practitioner, patient or related person), for example if the system just has an email address, to default to using RelatedPerson.
    • Russ/Rob: 7-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Comment:

      Communication.sender and Communication.recipient allow Patient|Practitioner|RelatedPerson - but it's not unusual to have a communication target - even a defined one - where you don't know what kind of role the person is playing. It's unclear how to use these elements in that case - this also applies to CommunicationRequest as well

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Grahame Grieve (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: