2015May core #975 - Need to distinguish pathologist from technologist comments

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • Orders & Observations
    • DiagnosticReport
    • 4.21.4.1
    • Hide

      add bolded text:

      "As atomic data items: a hierarchical set of nested references to Observation resources often including pathologist/radiologist interpretation(s), one or more images, and possibly with a conclusion and/or one or more coded diagnoses

      Show
      add bolded text: "As atomic data items: a hierarchical set of nested references to Observation resources often including pathologist/radiologist interpretation(s), one or more images, and possibly with a conclusion and/or one or more coded diagnoses
    • Eric Haas /Patrick Loyd:10-4-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • Yes
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]

      Existing Wording: and possibly with a conclusion and/or one or more coded diagnoses

      Comment:

      in the laboratory summative impressions,/interpretations Pathologist comment, Technologists comments - are not distinguished structurally (but only by name) from the other atomic elements. Radiology might be thought of differently, but the final impression is just one more section

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            clemmcdonald
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: