2015May core #994 - Should have createdDate, not just lastUpdatedDate

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Comment
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU1 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Claim
    • 1.10.3.3
    • Hide

      Historical information is accessed using Provenance and the "history" query capabilities. The metadata element contains information relevant to this resource snapshot and to this specific server. It doesn't contain historical information or "business" information. I.e. It wouldn't be appropriate to capture the date a particular document/artifact came into being but rather when did it come into being on a particular server.

      We'll be futher evaluating Provenance as part of STU 4.

      Show
      Historical information is accessed using Provenance and the "history" query capabilities. The metadata element contains information relevant to this resource snapshot and to this specific server. It doesn't contain historical information or "business" information. I.e. It wouldn't be appropriate to capture the date a particular document/artifact came into being but rather when did it come into being on a particular server. We'll be futher evaluating Provenance as part of STU 4.
    • Grahame Grieve/Josh Mandel: 7-0-0

      Existing Wording: Structure

      Comment:

      Structure includes lastUpdated and version of the meta information which are both very useful. However, it will also be useful to have a createdDate if available since that combined with lastUpdatedDate provide historical perspective of that meta information (similar to the Attachment change to add Creation).

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Ioana Singureanu
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: