Distinguish between IN1-49 versus IN2-26

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Medium

      The fields IN1-49 (Insured's ID Number) and IN2-26 (Payor Subscriber ID) appear to be redundant. It seems that the subscriber ID could go in either field. If IN2 actually has a different purpose then we should clarify the documentation. Or if it is redundant then we should deprecate it.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Nick Radov
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: