Does an implied value mean that it isn't really in the value set? - N-Term #16

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Terminology Infrastructure
    • ValueSet
    • 4.9.6 Value Set Disp
    • Hide

      Change to "The display and definitions are equivalent to a special designation with an implied designation.use meaning "primary designation" and a language equal to the Resource Language."

      Create a task to formalise the definition of the value set in R5

      Show
      Change to "The display and definitions are equivalent to a special designation with an implied designation.use meaning "primary designation" and a language equal to the Resource Language." Create a task to formalise the definition of the value set in R5
    • Grahame Grieve/Rob Hausam: 20-0-5
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • STU3

      Existing Wording: 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: The display and definitions are equivalent to a special designation with an implied designation.use of "primary code/designation" and a language equal to the Resource Language.

      Comment:

      The value set expansion for designation.use does not include 'primary code/designation'

      http://hl7.org/fhir/2018Sep/valueset-designation-use.html - does an implied value mean that it isn't really in the value set? Not clear. Same issue in Code System

      Summary:

      Does an implied value mean that it isn't really in the value set?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Carmela Couderc
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: