Observation-based extraction - same guidelines for updating an observation or doing nothing

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Structured Data Capture (SDC) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • 11.3.1
    • Hide

      We think the logic is correct, however the expression is unclear.

      Will change the order to list "take no action" first and make the "no change" bullet last within that section

      Will change the "update" to say "all of the conditions above apply, with the exception that the value *has*changed.

      I.e. Will stop repeating the 4 bullets that are unchanged to make things clearer

      Show
      We think the logic is correct, however the expression is unclear. Will change the order to list "take no action" first and make the "no change" bullet last within that section Will change the "update" to say "all of the conditions above apply, with the exception that the value *has*changed. I.e. Will stop repeating the 4 bullets that are unchanged to make things clearer
    • Brian Postlethwaite/Paul Lynch: 6-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Guidelines for updating an observation and doing nothing are all the same except for the fourth one. How can you decide to update or take no action if they have the same conditions?

        1. Screen Shot 2019-06-05 at 1.57.33 PM.png
          Screen Shot 2019-06-05 at 1.57.33 PM.png
          80 kB

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            joeegarcia
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: