Add content to the Consumer vs provider RTPBC page explaining why certain content returned in the provider-focused RTPBC messaging is not included the consumer-focused version. Information that is out of scope of the consumer-focused exchange In line with the goals and audience of this exchange, response information was either included or excluded from the specification based on whether it represents coverage or cost information relevant to the patient. For example, in the primary consumer use case, the patient's medication has already been prescribed and the practitioner has already considered potential contraindications and other factors--ultimately deciding to move ahead with the therapy. Because Consumer RTPBC does not seek to inform the prescribing decision, but instead provide the consumer with cost and coverage information after that decision is made, drug utilization review (DUR) and restricted opiod prescriber information is not included in the response. Likewise, because the patient is the user of this exchange's information, the response does not return "cost to plan" data returned by other standards to be considered during the prescribing process. Future versions of the guide will reflect feedback from implementers, and content will likely evolve over time. ----- In addition, add footnotes to the following elements in the table on this page, noting that the elements are not included in this version of the IG, but are being considered for future versions: Restricted Prescriber Maximums and Limitations Drug Utilization Review (DUR)