-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Highest
-
US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
-
current
-
Patient Care
-
Artifacts Summary
-
-
Eric Haas/Jay Lyle: 5-0-8
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
I don't understand (and I think the spec doesn't explain) under what circumstances a payer's request for clinical information would be authorized by a ServiceRequest/order instead of a text of string or a Claim resource. You've explicitly taken provider-to-provider out of scope in this version.
(Comment 24 - imported by: Jean Duteau)
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-15181 Affirmative - Christopher Schaut : 2021-Jan-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Balloted
- relates to
-
FHIR-30836 Suggest to remove the statements as there always is authorization somewhere
-
- Triaged
-
-
FHIR-30815 Provider to Provider use case should be out of scope as it has not been tested.
-
- Resolved - change required
-