-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Highest
-
US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
-
current
-
Patient Care
-
Specification [deprecated]
-
-
Correction
-
Yes
Suggest to remove the statements as there always is authorization somewhere, starting with being granted access to the system to interact, as well as that it is not clear yet, nor fully relevant in this IG, when a request specific authorization is required, a purpose of use level, is sufficient, or otherwise.
Existing Wording:
The most common scenario is where Task can (and even should) exist without an authorization.
(Comment 34 - imported by: Jean Duteau)
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-15191 Negative - Hans Buitendijk : 2021-Jan-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Balloted
- relates to
-
FHIR-30829 When would Task.reasonReference be a ServiceRequest?
-
- Resolved - change required
-