-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
DSTU1 [deprecated]
-
Orders & Observations
-
BodyStructure
-
Outstanding Issues (todo)
-
-
Correction
Existing Wording: • BodySite: Does this need to be a resource, or can it just be a reusable type?
Comment:
absolutely positively should be a vocabulary- in a field. Not even surer it should be a type. There are lots of shades of grey regarding what is a body site an how to represent ( e.g. whether laterality is included or not. And is Left heart a laterality -when describing one of the four chambers. The statement on the over view "Evolutionary development path from HL7 Version 2 and CDA - standards can co-exist and leverage each other", argues for a better tie between FHIR and V2 for messaging.
- duplicates
-
FHIR-7577 2015May core #868 - Recommend changing this to a "common structure" that could be used for Condition.site, etc.
-
- Resolved - No Change
-
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-1059 Negative - Clement McDonald : 2015-May-FHIR R1
- Balloted