-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
DSTU1 [deprecated]
-
Orders & Observations
-
BodyStructure
-
4.2.4
-
-
Eric Haas/Kathy Walsh: 7-0-2
-
Clarification
Existing Wording: BodySite resource
Proposed Wording: BodySite data type or some "common structure". BodySite is clearly not a good candidate for a RESTful service.
Comment:
BodySite is a qualifier for other observations. Searching BodySite by patient would return a set of anatomical sites (e.g. left ear, nose) where some findings may have occurred.
- is duplicated by
-
FHIR-7250 2015May core #310 - Body site should be a code, not a type or resource
-
- Duplicate
-
-
FHIR-7475 2015May core #770 - Complext structure or data type needed for BodySite (not resource)
-
- Duplicate
-
-
FHIR-11208 Agree BodySite should be a resource - 2016-09 core #362
-
- Duplicate
-
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-1388 Negative - Greg Staudenmaier : 2015-May-FHIR R1
- Balloted